Anil Hargovan
The Federal Court has not imposed extra penalties on six non-executive directors involved in the Centro court case, saying their convictions for breaching the Corporations Act are penalty enough.
My first impression suggests that Justice Middleton in the Centro case appears to have taken one step forward (in the liability decision which set the bar on directors performance standards in reading accounts dauntingly high) and two steps back (in the penalty decision handed down yesterday which did not go far enough in sanctioning oversight failure).
The tone of the penalty decision appears to be less caustic and more forgiving of the directors failure to exercise care and diligence.
The failure to throw the book at the directors in the penalty decision has polarised the corporate community, attracted controversy and seen a vituperative reaction from sections of the media.
The penalty decision elevates shame and reputational loss as strong determinants of general deterrence but will not appease those baying for blood following significant oversight by the directors in the accounts involving billions of dollars.
The penalty decision boosts the directors shame and reputational loss as an effective deterrence tool. Such sanctions will only be effective, however, for those directors who put a premium on their reputations.
Media reaction to the penalty decision would suggest that the penalties handed down were largely meaningless. It is important to remember that the judge refused to exonerate or grant forgiveness for breaches of the Corporation Act and did issue court declarations of breach of law which puts a stain of the cv of the directors and, more ominously, offers no comfort to the company and its directors facing class action by the shareholders.
In the refusal to grant forgiveness and the confirmation of breaches of law, the penalty decision has laid a stronger foundation and boosts the prospects of shareholder success in the class action against the company. Herein lies the potential for a greater penalty afforded by this decision. Perhaps the judge had one eye on the potential impact of the class action and tempered the penalty decision in light thereof.
Anil Hargovan is an Associate Professor at the Australian School of Taxation & Business Law at the ustralian School of Business.
2Comments»
You’re so interesting! I do not suppose I’ve read through something like that before.
So great to discover someone with some unique thoughts on this
topic. Really.. thanks for starting this up. This site
is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality!
This diet program plan need to be followed for a period of 7 days, and surprisingly one particular
can shed as significantly as ten pounds in a week.
The diet regime also helps to regulate insulin levels, which is also
good for diabetics.Most fad diets recommend a dramatic
reduce in calorie intake to accomplish weight loss.Many individuals usually do not stick
to the advised fad diet.You have this physique that craves a host
of nutrients, even though some cravings that it appears to have are skewed by years of feeding it a lot of the wrong points.
As most of us know, consuming slowly, and savoring the taste
of food, is critical to weight loss.Although a low-calorie diet,
it absolutely does not starve your physique and you won’t knowledge any dip in power levels.If it does, what is the average speed of a great quick low carb diet plan that will not just give 1 temporary fat loss effects?To satiate thirst, one particular can also drink cranberry juice and unsweetened tea throughout the diet program.You can very easily develop meal plans with little guess perform and you can get pleasure from your food much more than on other diets so you will likely stick to the program for as extended as you have to have.Instead, switching over to a diet that is nutritious but low in calories as well as enjoyable can provide sustained weight loss.So the equation is to burn off greater number of calories than you are taking in.
Leave Comments Below»