UNSW Sitewide

A collection of posts from across the UNSW Blogosphere!

UNSW Sitewide random header image

ISEA2010 RUHR Keynotes Roy Ascott Thu 26 August

Posted by on August 1st, 2010 · related topics


Thu 26 August 2010, 17:30h

Orchesterzentrum|NRW, Dortmund

Mind-Launch: Reflections/Projections on Education as Art

Moderated by Dieter Daniels (de)

In his lecture, Ascott looks at two of his education-based projects, the Groundcourse of

the early 1960s and the Planetary Collegium of the new millenium.

Their link is the search for structures that elicit and support creativity, enable research,

and develop innovation – of systems, structures, identities, language, and behaviours.

The field is art, technology and consciousness (technoetics).

The thread that links these two initiatives is cybernetics of the third kind, the art of

connective, interdependent, associative, transformative, and syncretic systems.

Education as art resists orthodoxy, denies academic predictability, opens up the territory

of the unknown in all its fields of inquiry and practice.

Roy Ascott is an artist and theorist whose research is invested in cybernetics,

technoetics, telematics, and syncretism. He is the founding president of the Planetary

Collegium, an international platform for art, technology and consciousness research,

based in Plymouth University.

Dieter Daniels is P rofessor for Art History and Media Theory at the Academy of Visual

Arts in Leipzig.

Questionmark Perception™ (QMP): A tool for authoring, delivering and reporting on web-based assessments and surveys linked from Blackboard or Moodle

Posted by on July 29th, 2010 · 643, Uncategorized

A/ Prof Gary Velan (Medicine)  gave a seminar on the QMP assessment system which enables educators to author, schedule, deliver, and report on surveys, formative quizzes and summative examinations (http://www.questionmark.co/uk/perception/).

For more information you can:

  • Comments Off on Questionmark Perception™ (QMP): A tool for authoring, delivering and reporting on web-based assessments and surveys linked from Blackboard or Moodle
  • Email to friend
  • Stay updated
  • Tags:

Lab Week 2

Posted by on July 27th, 2010 · Lab

Note: If you missed last week’s lab you will need to activate your CSE account. Look at the instructions from last week. Ask your tutor about this before you proceed.

Your task in this lab will be to create some objects and make them move. You’ll also learn how to import more interesting models than simple cubes and spheres.
[Read more →]

ISEA2010 RUHR Leonardo Education and Art Forum (LEAF) Meeting: Art-Science – Curricular Models and Best Practices

Posted by on July 26th, 2010 · related topics

August 27 · 1:00pm – 4:30pm

Meeting: Art-Science – Curricular Models and Best Practices

Edward Shanken
Jennifer Kanary Nikolov(a)
Jill Scott
Paul Thomas

The Leonardo Education and Art Forum (LEAF) promotes the advancement of artistic research and academic scholarship at the intersections of art, science, and technology. Serving practitioners, scholars, and students who are members of the Leonardo community, we provide a forum for collaboration and exchange with other scholarly communities, including CAA, SIGGRAPH, SLSA, and ISEA. Chaired by Shanken, our workshop at ISEA2010 will address difficulties typically encountered while undertaking art-science research, teaching, and when meshing curricula from diverse fields. Following a twenty-minute introduction to various aspects of this theme, attendees will participate in one of the ninety-minute working-group discussions led by Nikolov(a), Scott, and Thomas, international experts in the field. Our aim is to identify and share ways to surmount some of the difficulties commonly encountered in interdisciplinary art/science research and curricula with the aim of publishing a guide to effective models and best practices.

Issues addressed may include:

• How can the knowledge base and skills of different disciplines be integrated in the classroom?
• How can the credibility of references and key arguments in another field be judged?
• How can appropriate collaborators outside one’s field be identified?
• How can interdisciplinary curricula be evaluated and gain accreditation?
• What are some best practices for interdisciplinary research practice and curriculum?

Nikolov(a) notes that in recent years art education programmes have shifted into the realm of knowledge economies in which certain art practice’s are regarded as a creative form of knowledge production. The more we learn about the social and economical values of such knowledge productions the more Masters and Ph.D. artistic research programmes seem to appear all over the world. In order to address their pertinent research questions the researcher artists that enter such programmes often find themselves in complex trans-disciplinary structures for which collaborative and organisational skills are imperative. Too often a lack of these skills gets in the way of successful research practices. This sets a challenge for bachelor education curricula. How to prepare artists and scientists for future collaborations? How to develop a curriculum that facilitates these Master and Ph.D. programmes of artistic research? By bringing talented students from the University of Amsterdam and the Gerrit Rietveld Academie together in the experimental honours programme Art and Research we allow for early insights and hands on experience with the values and pitfalls of art-science collaborations. In this presentation I will address case studies that show the need for more focus on artistic research educational structures on the Bachelor level.

Scott points out that by now there are established Ph.D. programs that specialize in offering more established artists and designers from all disciplines the opportunity to focus on specific media and art research topics for their careers. For example, the Z-node (University of the Arts, ZHdK in Zurich) part of the international “Planetary Collegium,” has established protocols for undertaking work that joins theory and practice, helping students make the transitions to scholarly reflection and robust research. The curriculum is supported by group communication and correlated research topics, composite sessions, and international conferences at which other Collegium nodes convene. This structure enables researchers to explore transdisciplinary and transcultural theory about communication, collaboration, social science, natural science, cultural difference and environmental sustainability. Scott’s workshop will discuss how curriculum can relate art and design practices to applied scientific research, especially in the areas of psychology, biology, neuroscience, physics and artificial intelligence. The discussion will consider how to accomplish this goal, which demands: 1) exploring and defining new cultural and environmental epistemologies between design, art, science and technology; 2) searching for original hybrid combinations of media and art practices and scientific theories that are engaged with critical social and ethical discourses; and 3) theorizing the future impacts of art and technology on both western and eastern cultures.

Thomas observes that a profound shift is occurring in our understanding of postmodern media culture. Since the turn of the millennium the emphasis on mediation as technology and as aesthetic idiom, as opportunity for creative initiatives and for critique, has become increasingly normative and doctrinaire. The focus is on implementing research strategies within the fine arts that challenge past disciplinary orthodoxies and epistemological constraints, in a quest for more productive and synergistic intellectual and practical methodologies between art, science and humanity. The focus will be on exploring capacity for critical engagement, socio-cultural reflection, situated academic critique and plastic processes. To explore ideas that will provide a basis for generating different and potentially more expansive understandings of complex transdisciplinary issues, taking account of multiple perspectives and contingencies. Institutional modeling of alternative curriculum approaches post new media is intended to demonstrate the academic viability, scope and rigor of transdisciplinarity.

Edward Shanken is author of Art and Electronic Media (Phaidon, 2009) and editor of Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology and Consciousness (U Cal P, 2003). He served as Chair of LEAF from 2004-8 and is currently LEAF International Liaison

Paul Thomas is an artist working with nanotechnology and Associate Professor, College of Fine Art, University of New South Wales. Founder of Collaborative Research in Art, Science and Humanity (CRASH) within the School of Design and Art at Curtin University and BEAP, the Biennial of Electronic Arts, Perth.

Jill Scott is Professor for Research in the Institute Cultural Studies in Art, Media and Design at the Zurich University of the Arts (ZhdK) in Zürich and Co-Director of the Artists-in-Labs Program. She is also Vice Director of the Z-Node Ph.D. program at the University of Plymouth.

Jennifer Kanary Nikolov(a) is Lecturer in the Art and Research Honours program of the Gerrit Rietveld Academy and the University of Amsterdam, and a Ph.D. candidate at M-Node, Planetary Collegium, University of Plymouth, UK.

http://www.isea2010ruhr.org/conference/friday-27-august-2010-dortmund/p47-leonardo-education-and-art-forum-leaf-meeting-art-science-curricular-models

Lecture videos and notes

Posted by on July 26th, 2010 · lectures

The videos of lectures are now available on UNSW TV. They should also in time become available on UNSW’s eLearning YouTube channel and on iTunes U but that doesn’t seem to have happened yet.

In related news, it doesn’t look like I will have time to write lecture notes on the wiki on top of everything else I’m preparing for the subject. So I’m afraid you’ll have to make do with the lecture slides, the videos and the other online resources.

Resources from ‘The Flat World has Swung Open: How Web Technology is Revolutionising Education’

Posted by on July 25th, 2010 · 643, Resources

You can access resources from Prof Curtis Bonk’s seminar via the TELT blog here: http://blogs.unsw.edu.au/telt/blog/2010/07/21/the-world-is-open/, including a recording of his seminar and various useful websites.

Upcoming Seminar: Questionmark Perception

Posted by on July 25th, 2010 · 393, 643

Questionmark Perception™ (QMP):  A tool for authoring, delivering and reporting on web-based assessments and surveys linked from Blackboard or Moodle

A/Prof Gary M. Velan, School of Medical Sciences

26 July, 12.30 – 2pm

Learning & Teaching Workshop (Room 416), Level 4 Mathews Building

This seminar is intended to provide participants with opportunities to:

  1. Discuss the impact of formative assessments on learning.
  2. Discuss the pros and cons of online formative assessments.
  3. Compare and contrast QMP with other tools for creating online assessments.
  4. Discuss their own plans for formative assessments, and ask questions about QMP’s capacity to meet their needs.

You must register to attend.  For more information and to register online, go to: www.edtec.unsw.edu.au/event_rego/events.cfm

New York City’s annual global business plan competition

Posted by on July 22nd, 2010 · competition, Uncategorized

The New York City’s annual global business plan competition, NYC Next Idea 2010-2011 will be held in April 2011.

The Competition provides students and recent alumni of non-U.S. schools the unique opportunity to access substantial funding and support to implement their business ideas in New York City.

In addition to funding prospects, the contestants will gain valuable experience interacting with leaders from top venture capitalist firms and businesses in New York City, as well as the opportunities to tour the City and learn about its robust business and entrepreneurship community.

We are inviting teams of 2-5 participants to submit business plans for ideas that may be commercially viable in New York City. Six teams of finalists (three from the undergraduate track and three from the graduate track) will win a six-day, all-expenses-paid trip to New York City in April 2011 to participate in the final round of the Competition, which will be hosted at Columbia University.

UNSW was identified as a strong candidate for the Competition due to the superior quality of your programs and students. And we would welcome participation from your students and recent alumni in the 2010-2011 Competition.

More information on the Competition can be found on at the NYCEDC website (www.nycedc.com/nextidea).

Art Of Stealth

Posted by on July 22nd, 2010 · Uncategorized

So far my thesis topic has been a big learning curve for me. I had never really thought of trying my hand at game design, which is why I was slightly hesitant when I came to understand that the game engine I would be using for experimentation was somewhat “a work in progress”.  Throughout the uni break I was working almost diligently on modification of the game mechanics to something I was happy to start working with. It is a pleasure to say that I am almost there.

I am happy to report that I am pretty much to schedule with what I had intend to have ready by second semester. I have namely been experimenting with different  methods of motion planning and am surprised as how something so simple can drastically change the feel of game play. The two methods I have mainly been looking at are;

  1. Delauny Triangularization using equidistant points between the level boundaries
  2. Random Roadmap methods which employ generating a number of random points across the level and running Delauny triangularization across them as to create suitable paths for the AI to explore.

While the first method is quite simplistic and reliable, the paths the AI take can be reasonably limited in the exploration space. The second methods is interesting as every game is slightly different, and with the monotony of testing it is nice to have the playing ground mixed up; but whether this is suitable for an actual, solid implementation, I’m not sure. What I am doing at the moment is working on constructing my own paths about the level, “hand drawn” if you will.

As far as tracking goes I have implemented a shared particle filter. Every guard contributes to the maintaining and updating of the single distribution. I have found, while being a very simplistic approach, that it is unsuitable. During the resampling portion of the particle filter algorithm, a single focal point tends to emerge when the distribution contains less than about 500 particles. This becomes incredibly boring to play with as every guard then heads towards this single point, converging uselessly – especially when the centre of the mass is chosen. The guards paths then tend to overlap more than my liking, and this is not the behavior I would like to see emerging.

So far I have not experimented to much with planning algorithms, but the night is still young, as it were. So far I have only looked at choosing points at random from the cloud or sampling them in order to find the mean of the distribution. As above, sampling the mean of the single distribution makes the game play quite boring. What I would like to try is taking a handful of particles, randomly, and finding their mean as to determine a psuedo-mean. I am hoping this method will provide what I originally sort after and reduce the overlapping of search paths.

Education for Sustainability | International Greening Education Event 2010

Posted by on July 19th, 2010 · conference, Self funded

A three-day International Event on Greening Education will be held from 27th to 29th of October 2010 in the “green” city of Karlsruhe, Germany. This event will take academia, education and environmental policy makers, senior members of academic institutions, representatives of government and non-governmental organisations and international development agencies, teachers, sustainable development and environmental management professionals and other stakeholders through the need for greening education and then discuss effective initiatives that can be taken to translate “education for sustainability” in to actions.

 Further to the knowledge sharing on greening education including topics such as ecologizing curriculum (incorporating sustainability), greening of courses and creating low carbon education institutions; the upcoming event also provides an excellent networking opportunity with academia, sustainable development practitioners and other stakeholders in Europe and beyond. An excursion (optional) on Saturday the 30th of October, 2010 is planned which will also provide an additional and informal networking opportunity.

 UNSW students are invited to attend this international event.  Contact m.kofod@unsw.edu.au to be nominated to represent your institution.

 For further information, please see the event details.

http://www.etechgermany.com/IGEE2010.pdf